Archive for August, 2009

A local business with an outstanding web presence?

Xero. Billed as the world’s easiest accounting system, the site is also a study of what can be achieved with enough time and skill, and the right people.

Xero

Xero

The company is very impressive with their passionate pursuit of doing exactly what their customers need and want, with almost no limit to the ends of perfection in their execution. We should admire, and try to imitate, their design and development process in producing this merger of business tool and user experience.

Great things Xero have done:
• They released early and release often. Releasing the site early to users has allowed Xero to receive feedback and make rapid changes to their plans.
• They are making full use of all communication channels to promote and support their business.
• Much like Google and TradeMe, their first thought in everything they do is for their site users. This can be contrasted with sites like Yahoo and MSN where generally their first thoughts are for their advertisers and partners.
• It’s interesting to note the number of times Xero uses the word “you” or “your” (rather than “we” and “our”) compared to their competitors or other B2B websites.
• They blog, they Tweet, they comment and they contribute to other’s blogs and discussions. They have a conversation with their customers rather than talk at them.
• They ‘walk the talk’ by providing a simple, elegant and responsive user experience – much like their product – practicing the usability mantra of removing as many elements as possible from interface design.

This sort of elegant and overwhelmingly usable product and user experience design suits the New Zealand mindset. We’ve always been good at making things work and in the last 20 years we’ve realised our creativity is world class. All we need now is to trust ourselves and produce more like this.

http://www.xero.com/

Author: Tony Gardner, Saatchi & Saatchi DGS

Will the user pays revenue model work for our publishing companies?

With the balance sheets of most publishing companies taking a hammering in recent times, the latest thought is that a “user pays” content or subscription model might offer some hope to fledging revenue.  Getting users to pay for content sounds like a simple remedy for publishing companies to shore up the bottom line, however, the single biggest issue with this idea, is that, unless the content is unique and offers an inherent value to the user (WSJ and FT are good examples of this), consumers would almost certainly refuse to pay.

The most recent organisation to be talking about a “pay model” is News Corp.  Mr Murdoch has reportedly said he is “absolutely looking at a user pays system for some of News Corp’s British news websites”, which include The Times, The Sun, The News of The World and the Sunday Times.  The jury is out however, as to weather the content offered on these sites is content that users will actually pay for.  If I was a betting man – I’d say not.
There is no doubt that publishing news and television content is an expensive undertaking for media vendors. It’s now just becoming clear that much of this content is simply not going to have adequate underwriting through advertising for many of the publishers.

One could say their current predicament is their own fault.  It’s been a topic of wide debate for years, that news organisations and television companies in particular, have been slowly tightening the noose around their own necks, by offering content online to the masses for free.  Traditional newspaper businesses have seen their cash-cow classified business regressing for years, as it’s migrated to the web (with revenues probably never to return), so this issue has hardly been sprung onto the publishing companies overnight.  There is little doubt that the present situation has been greatly exaggerated by the current economic downturn, but unfortunately, it could simply be too late for many of the publishers to change consumer perception and habit.

Our generation has now has come to expect to have content freely available on the internet.  We’ve become way too accustomed to this model – thus significantly inhibiting the opportunity for publishing companies to successfully move to subscription, or pay-per-view models.

Only time will tell if the model will work.  It may be that publishers will be forced to change what content they offer to make the pay model work.  One thing is for certain, it will be very tough going for the publishing companies.  After all, how much “value” does a consumer place on something they get for nothing?

Author: Chris Riley, OMD Digital